Read the whole story at: redstate.com
A new report on COVID-19 origins suggests that SARS-CoV-2, the virus responsible for the COVID-19 infection, likely originated at a Wuhan Wet Market, despite the questionable source of the information used to compile the report. When I say you’ve got to read until the end, you’ve got to read until the end. This one should let you know just how bad things are when it comes to the COVID-19 origins investigations.
Dr. Michael Worobey is an evolutionary biologist and the Head of the Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Department at the University of Arizona. Early on in the pandemic, Worobey appeared to be a very reliable source of sanity in the discussion of the COVID-19 origin, stating openly that there was not enough information to determine the origins of SARS-CoV-2, and that both the zoonotic event (that is the jump from animals to humans) and the lab-leak from the Wuhan Institute of Virology, were entirely possible potentials.
That all changed November 18th, when Worobey published his “findings” of an “investigation” into the origins in COVID-19. Those finding suggests that the virus likely originated from the wet market, a contention long-held by lab-leak opponents, despite no evidence of a host animal or identified intermediate species. In fact, this new report is filled with glaring holes and jumps in evidence and logic to reach certain conclusions. As the author identifies early cases of COVID-19, he goes into detail about two particular patients:
Read the whole story at: redstate.com